thegman2.0 Selvy9 mikeL9286 LTL7360 MarkyMark67 nkmi1984 cyhiphopp What do you guys think of doing this since our numbers are dwindling? We can take the SEC since we already have 3 users in that conference and just fill everyone in accordingly. 4 of us would be in the SEC West and 4 in the SEC East Here is what I envisioned West Texas Texas A&M Iowa State USC LSU Auburn Alabama East Florida Michigan Miami Mizzou South Carolina Georgia Tennessee What are your thoughts on this?
This would also ensure you get 3 user games in your division plus potentially another user game when your scheduled to play someone from the other division. Additionally pre-conference I would load up everyone's schedule to help out our strength of schedules.
Wouldn't it be more user games than that even? I guess you might get all 3 of the CPU teams from the other division, but if you play everyone in your division plus one or two from the other? I guess user games are kind of the point in an online dynatsy, but it might end up in more simmed games or a longer time between advances. That'd be my only fear (mostly speaking for myself with a newborn in the house ) EDIT: Although I guess it wouldn't be much different than where we are now with the number of user games, since there'd only be one game in conference title week with everyone else on bye and one CPU game in bowl week.
sounds alright just be more user games why put me in there with am and iowa state and your self u can we just be old big 12 or half of old big 8 lol
DOWN! User games are what this things all about. As for wait times, I'd rather consistent 3 day wait times with a user game rather than a 2 day advance after playing CPU. Plus, this will stop anybody from really sneaking into the national championship game... not that I'm guilty of that...
I' m cool with it. If it ends up being too many user games we can switch to two conferences. Big10/12 and SEC.
