Chicago Bulls get: 1. Paul George-SG 79 22 yrs B pot 2yrs/$5.86M 2. Roy Hibbert- C 76 25 yrs B pot 4 yrs/$58.00M Indiana Pacers get: 1.Joakim Noah- C 83 27 yrs B- pot 4 yrs/$50.50M 2.Nate Robinson- PG 78 28 yrs B- pot 1 yr/$1.15M 3. Vladimir Radmanovic- PF 51 - pot 1yr/$1.35M Found this on trade finder when I was looking for a SG. Pacers receive a better Center while, receiving a player that can play SG or PG in Nate Robinson. JFace907
Your review board for this trade was RyanC ZCar352 and myself. We have voted to deny this trade. While Hibbert and Noah cancel each other out, you are not compensating the Pacers enough for a guy on a rookie contract that is a budding star in this game. Especially if Nate walks at season's end (which he is known to do).
Fair enough. I have another trade to submit with similar players. But was wondering if a first or second round pick in 2013 would allow the previous trade offer to be accepted.
No, draft picks are virtually worthless unless its top 5 or 10. Thats normally about how deep the drafts are.
Gotcha well here is my second trade offer. Chicago gets: 1. Paul George- SG 79 22 yrs B pot 2 yrs/$5.86M 2. George Hill - PG 74 26 yrs C+ pot 5 yrs/$40.00M 3. Tyler Hansbrough- PF 71 27 yrs B- pot 1 yr/$3.06M Indiana gets: 1.Nate Robinson- PG 78 28 yrs B- pot 1 yr/$1.15M 2. Carlos Boozer- PF 79 30 yrs - pot 3 yrs/$47.10M 3. Marquis Teague- PG 68 19 yrs C+ pot 2 yrs/$1.93M Nate Robinson better player than Geroge Hill in a PG swap. Boozer is better than Hansbrough in PF swap. Marquis Teague is only 19 years old and has potential.
This trade Connor, actually takes a step back in terms of value to the Pacers. You can't acquire the best player in the deal AND dump the league's worst contract outside of Joe Johnson in Brooklyn.
Well shit haha. Thanks, I'm not very understand of all the contracts of the NBA. Just know I'm trying to get a SG and Paul George looked like the easiest to acquire. I don't think I'll be proposing any other for now.
