Discussion in 'Thread Archive' started by Bulldog, May 15, 2011.
Personally I like idea of 4 to a conference , two to a side or whatnot, makes schedule balance and easier on the commish
I think the best option would be to go with 3 conferences with title games
3 x 4, all in conferences with two divisions and a championship game.
I always thought 3 conferences, 2 per division. And play 2 ooc games(1 vs each conference) was the best and most balanced way to do it. Probably acc, b10, and sec.
voted for 3.. Same reason as everyone else. 2 to a dvision with CCG's easily best way to go imo-- only downer is I think 90% of the leagues on the site are doing it
We could always pick a conference with 12 teams, say the Big 10 or Pac 12, and let everyone be a team.
That would be different.
i vote for 4 conferences. But i am also happy with 3 conferences.
What are the top conferences so far?
I'm guessing SEC, Big10, ACC, Pac12 in that order?
I'm cool with 4, just that one team has a little bit of an advantage
Honestly that would be my top pick. I'd be fine with using one of the lower tier schools too. The only knock I've seen throughout here with this idea is scheduling but I honestly think it wouldnt be any slower then what we are now (I'm not trying to ruffle any feathers here guys, just saying I don't think we could kill each other over a 3 day advance every week) As always it would sometimes be quicker.
all that aside I have always wanted to be in a one conference dynasty here on TF. I believe the competition would be so much fun, and winning a conference championship would be quite a feat.
I am ALL for a 1 conference.
Well 3 conferences won the vote...
Looks like 3 conferences it is. Look for a vote on what conferences shortly.
Fack, I was excited for 1 after PSU brought it up
EDIT: ^^ Is being difficult
Separate names with a comma.