Rules Committee Vote - Addition to Defensive Play Calling

Discussion in 'Thread Archive' started by natedawg212000, Apr 19, 2010.

  1. natedawg212000

    natedawg212000 New Orleans Saints

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    6,558
    Rules Committee Vote - Addition to Defensive Play Calling

    vote, tweak, ect.
     
  2. natedawg212000

    natedawg212000 New Orleans Saints

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    6,558
    I am good with this. The main defense should be a base 3/4 or 4/3 with others scattered in depending on the game.
     
  3. Claven

    Claven OMFL-Redskins

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,686
    I love this too. I vote yes. Anyone who runs 46 majority of a game is taking advantage.
     
  4. Emmdotfrisk

    Emmdotfrisk Working half days on my days off.

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    11,955
    Yes.

    Once again I used the 46 as an example just because I think it is abused a lot, but this goes for any formation other than your "base." Some teams never deviate irl from their 3-4 or 4-3 set unless it is 3rd and long or 3rd and short.
     
  5. Jeremy

    Jeremy The ONLY 2 time OMFL CHampion!!!!

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,749
    I like it but there might be one exception. I beleieve that the Tenn Def playbook has the 4-4 as their base defense. This is the only playbook with that defense. I think that exception should be allowed.
    Other than that i like it.
     
  6. Claven

    Claven OMFL-Redskins

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,686
    I will agree to allow that exception for titans Def playbook
     
  7. natedawg212000

    natedawg212000 New Orleans Saints

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    6,558
    lets get it up there.
     
  8. Claven

    Claven OMFL-Redskins

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,686
    This rule has passed and will be added to the rulebook. FINAL DECISION.

     

Share This Page