Slider Proposal

Discussion in 'The Tradition' started by BlyGilmore, Jul 23, 2010.

  1. BlyGilmore

    BlyGilmore It's All In The Hips!

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,045
    Slider Proposal

    Let me know your thoughts on this. This weekend everybody play two computer games using these sliders ...

    QB Accuracy...................50-65
    Pass Blocking..................50-50
    WR Catching...................50-50
    RB Ability.......................50-60
    Run Blocking...................45-60
    Pass Coverage................50-50
    Pass Rush......................50-50
    Interceptions..................40-50
    Rush Defense..................50-70
    Tackling.........................50-50
    FG Power.......................50-50
    FG Accuracy...................50-50
    Punt Power.....................50-50
    Punt Accuracy.................50-50
    KO Power........................50-50

    One game against a powerhouse top ten team, one against a middle of the road ranked in the 20s team.

    Report back in this thread your passing and rushing stats, with the same for the computer - we pull all the info together and see what they look like.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. RynoAid

    RynoAid ..

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2009
    Messages:
    9,192
    im thinking about a double whataburger with cheese and mustard, add jalapenos
     
  3. jms493

    jms493 Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    8,906
    I will play a Game Wisconsin vs Penn State with these sliders and report back results.
     
  4. NYJuggalo45

    NYJuggalo45 Walk On

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,766
    i'll switch the side league to these too if you guys who are in that league want to try em out with other teams. although i firmly believe the following are too high

    QB Accuracy...................50-65 (definitely user and even cpu a bit)
    RB Ability.......................50-60 (user prob still too high)
    Run Blocking...................45-60 (ditto)
    Interceptions..................40-50 (much too high for both)
    Tackling.........................50-50 (bump this up some for cpu if you want run game slowed down)
     
  5. BlyGilmore

    BlyGilmore It's All In The Hips!

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,045
    well for running i don't think the issue is the computer tackling. the issue is them getting sealed off and huge holes.

    and my biggest concern is if you nerf running too much you take away the inside the tackle game, turning running (again) into sweeps, pitches and all off tackle stuff.

    btw might not be far off either. Looks like UNC gave Mogriff one helluva game. Ryno has Miami which might be interesting. And Notre Dame hung with me and made things difficult until the fourth quarter.
     
  6. NYJuggalo45

    NYJuggalo45 Walk On

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,766
    fair enough. lemme know if you guys want these in the side league too.
     
  7. HotRod

    HotRod You ain't bout dat life!

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    6,115
    Featured Threads:
    1
    Played Ohio St with Purdue using these sliders. Ohio State gave me a good game, their RB had a great game rushing some points the CPU run game felt a little too powerful but maybe I was having flashbacks to the tourney final. I had trouble running on Ohio State which felt realistic as Purdue's line is not nearly as good as the OSU D-line. Also the low number of yards can be attributed to 5 sacks. Anyway here are the team stats.

    Column 1
    Purdue Ohio St.
    Score 41 34
    1st Downs 12 19
    Total Offense 445 411
    Rushes-Yards-TD 17-25-2 40-177-3
    Comp-Att-TD 18-38-3 14-23-1
    Passing Yards 420 234
    3rd Down Conv 7-12 8-12
    Turnovers 1 2
    Fumbles 1 1
    INT 0 1
     
  8. BRUCE80

    BRUCE80 Let the dirt just shower over you..

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    6,820
    Did you hit some big plays HR?

    18 completions for 420 is alot.
     
  9. HotRod

    HotRod You ain't bout dat life!

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    6,115
    Featured Threads:
    1
    Yeah I had a couple 50+ yard TD plays. But the type of offense I run I go for big chunks at a time, LOL.
     
  10. Mogriffjr

    Mogriffjr Walk On

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    5,164
    Featured Threads:
    2
    U mean the sliders weren't changed when I almost lost to UNC last night? Whoa...lol
     
  11. BlyGilmore

    BlyGilmore It's All In The Hips!

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,045
    nope. those were default.

    i really don't think we're as far off as it looked before because we were playing scrub teams.

    tone down our running a bit, increase their running a bit and take away some of the computer INTs and I think we're in business.

    I know personally Notre Dame gave me a run for my money with the score 21-17 after three quarters and they completed 74 percent of their passes.
     
  12. BlyGilmore

    BlyGilmore It's All In The Hips!

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,045
    i actually had USC beat me on a last second FG ...

    USC Stanford
    Score 31 28
    First Down 17 13
    Total Offense 367 328
    Rushing 23 for 79 yards, 0 TD 20 for 84 yards, 3 TD
    Passing 25 for 32, 288 yards, 4 TD, 1 INT 15 for 26, 244 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT
    3rd Down 5-9 (55%) 4-9 (44%)
     
  13. Mogriffjr

    Mogriffjr Walk On

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    5,164
    Featured Threads:
    2
    I'd be down for slider adjustment Bly

    truth be told, UNC has a damn near NFL type defense and while I passed well, i couldn't run for shit and their ends were ridiculously good.
     
  14. Hellisan

    Hellisan Schemin 'em up

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    10,590

    I talked to Hotrod about them last night and we had a little dialogue. I'm going to use yours as a base, while also making some minor adjustments to them.

    the sliders entered into the OD are as follows:


    QB Accuracy...................40-55
    Pass Blocking..................45-50
    WR Catching...................50-50
    RB Ability.......................50-60
    Run Blocking...................45-60
    Pass Coverage................45-45
    Pass Rush......................50-50
    Interceptions..................40-60
    Rush Defense..................50-65
    Tackling.........................50-50
    FG Power.......................50-50
    FG Accuracy...................50-50
    Punt Power.....................50-50
    Punt Accuracy.................50-50
    KO Power........................50-50


    I have advanced the dynasty to the next week.
     
  15. BlyGilmore

    BlyGilmore It's All In The Hips!

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,045
    coo works for me ... although i probably shouldn't have said anything until after playing Oregon lol.
     
  16. BlyGilmore

    BlyGilmore It's All In The Hips!

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,045
    any thoughts about making a couple of minor tweaks to this? i think this are playable, but would like to see ...

    - Human Pass blocking back to 50 (PA passes are like last year - half the time you're on your back before you can do anything).

    - CPU INTs down to 50 or 55 (I've seen some dumb ass INTs since this was moved up).

    - Either Human run blocking up to 50 or CPU run defense down to 60. (Numbers are down under 6 a carry as it is, but we've also had a few people straight up shut down and some higher/more ridiculous passing yards as a result).
     
  17. Hellisan

    Hellisan Schemin 'em up

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    10,590
    Yeah I'd be down for this if we could reduce the QB's throw accuracy for our side.

    :)

    I went 18-20 yesterday.

    YES, I know I have Locker, but.... Look at Purdue :) I like the man defense interaction at the sliders we're currently using, what do you guys think of it?
     
  18. HotRod

    HotRod You ain't bout dat life!

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    6,115
    Featured Threads:
    1
    No sliders can hold me back!! Muahahaha!
     
  19. BRUCE80

    BRUCE80 Let the dirt just shower over you..

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    6,820
    I am against making my qbs any worse!
     
  20. jms493

    jms493 Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    8,906
    I like the sliders. If you want to move QB accuracy down to 45 thats fine. The really good passers of the league will still probably have no problems no matter where it is at. I am at 78% now....but only 32 attempts.

    I agree about pass blocking....unless my line is only run blockers they are terrible at PB and they are all 90+ ovr.
     
  21. BRUCE80

    BRUCE80 Let the dirt just shower over you..

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    6,820
    You have really only passed the ball 32 times this year?
     
  22. BlyGilmore

    BlyGilmore It's All In The Hips!

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    3,045
    QB accuracy is currently at 40 lol.

    who did you go 18 for 20 on?

    IMO if we lower it even more we're all compensate by going to more slants and posts.

    as it is we're completing at a lower percentage than the computer over two weeks, and had more INTs.
     
  23. jms493

    jms493 Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    8,906

    That is incorrect....it is 29/52 for 55% (my mistake)

    I tend to chew clock alot too therefore I have fewer snaps.

    LEave the QB acc at 40%
     
  24. Hellisan

    Hellisan Schemin 'em up

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    10,590
    You never change man.... lmao
     
  25. Hellisan

    Hellisan Schemin 'em up

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    10,590
    For now, I also like the sliders. Blaza took a beating yesterday and almost came back... Let's be real, USF is going to lose a few games this year. Stanford will have a good year but will probably lose to USC.

    I think we're on the right track as it is, I don't know about making it easier...
     

Share This Page