Discussion in 'The Experience' started by UofCWildcat, Jan 31, 2013.
Gonna have to fire up the instant commit on that tight end.
No! He looks so good dude. You don't need him. It's not like one of your back up tight ends left. Wait? He did? Fuck
Tight end is my only need for next year.
Damn! I can see why most of you have your guys 100% scouted when you sign them. Most of the guys on your board are at least 60% scouted already with some 80+% and 100% guys. Most of my guys are < 40% scouted. It was nice to see Salas was 82(+4) with 83% scouting though. I might have to go after him now instead of the other TE on my board. Here's how he looks to me:
Yeah I usually pick guys and scout em and if I lose out on guys I go find other and will have time for them then.
Im trying to fight you on that LB lol i need him for the future of my 3-4!!
UofCWildcat, have you spoken to this guy, particularly last week?
I'm pretty sure that you haven't since he's not on your board. If not, this is pretty cool. CU has been in 2nd place pretty much the whole time, but this week you "jumped" over them. If you talked to him then it makes sense, but assuming that you didn't, then it's cool as hell because you didn't "jump over Colorado" but instead I "pushed CU below you" by negative recruiting. I didn't realize that negative recruiting could be so strong (even though it's only Colorado).
Nice. I actually have not at all. Good to see it actually works...
Separate names with a comma.