Would like everyone's input

Discussion in 'Thread Archive' started by bcduggan, Sep 20, 2010.

  1. bcduggan

    bcduggan Walk On

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,771
    Would like everyone's input

    So we can get good realistic sliders. Let's play the first season to get the right sliders.Then restart the dynasty with everyone keeping their coaching points.

    Personally, I like these sliders. However, I do see where there are issues. I am open for changes. I even have other sets, some are AA, I am looking at.

    Thanks,
    Brian
     
  2. BigSmooth33

    BigSmooth33 Walk On

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Messages:
    7,045
    Just my opinion, no need to restart the whole deal just for slider modifications. I snagged MTSU for building and dont' mind if the sliders adjust as the team is built.

    My only beef so far is the CPU INT's. I had two where the LB's leapt into outerspace to deflect the pass and forced 2 tip INT's.

    Maybe down grade rush defense slightly or improve run blocking slightly.
     
  3. mikedredd

    mikedredd Crop Life

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,328
    I agree with Smooth...(even though I lost my starting QB in the first quarter of the first game)...i would prefer to just keep going with the dynasty...but I can see where you would want to restart especially if our dynasty is not full because new coaches prefer to start in year one..anyways as always I am down with whatever is best for the league
     
  4. bcduggan

    bcduggan Walk On

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,771
    These are what the sliders are currently:

    Difficulty: Heisman
    Quarter Length: 8 minutes
    GameSpeed: Slow
    Player Threshold: 0

    User Slider CPU
    10 QB Accuracy 10
    50 Pass Blocking 50
    40 WR Catching 40
    50 RB Ability 50
    50 Run Blocking 50
    65 Pass Coverage 65
    50 Pass Rush 0
    100 Interceptions 100
    40 Rush Defense 40
    50 Tackling 50
    15 FG Power 15
    20 FG Accuracy 50
    50 Punt Power 50
    100 Punt Accuracy 100
    15 Kickoff Power 15

    Now Bigsmooth, are you talking user or cpu for run blocking/run defense?

    Also reduce ints or reduce pass coverage?
     
  5. BigSmooth33

    BigSmooth33 Walk On

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Messages:
    7,045
    User run blocking, CPU run defense...

    Probably just reduce INTS? Coverage seems ok, it was the INT's that were a bit extreme against Mizzou. 2 of them should have just been knocked down/away due to the good coverage... I should have saved the INT's...

    [​IMG]
    This is what one of them was like, and it was from a LB.
     
  6. bcduggan

    bcduggan Walk On

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,771
    either raise user run block 5 or lower cpu run defense 5

    lower ints by 10.

    Got it.
     
  7. BigSmooth33

    BigSmooth33 Walk On

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Messages:
    7,045
    Please don't do this just on my account.

    Do you feel the same way? Anyone else agree (or disagree)?
     
  8. bcduggan

    bcduggan Walk On

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,771
    Bigsmooth>The feedback I am getting from people both withiin the dynasty and outside the dynasty is interceptions are too unrealistic/superhuman.

    I will make the interceptions change for week 4.
     
  9. dmanno2

    dmanno2 Walk On

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Messages:
    159
    Yeah great call on the interceptions change! Most everthing else seems to be working great, since the field goal issue was already addressed.
     
  10. bcduggan

    bcduggan Walk On

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,771
    User Slider CPU
    10 QB Accuracy 10
    50 Pass Blocking 50
    40 WR Catching 40
    50 RB Ability 50
    50 Run Blocking 50
    65 Pass Coverage 65
    50 Pass Rush 0
    100 Interceptions 100
    40 Rush Defense 40
    50 Tackling 50
    15 FG Power 15
    20 FG Accuracy 50
    50 Punt Power 50
    100 Punt Accuracy 100
    15 Kickoff Power 15

    What's below is a list of changes a friend of mine suggested for the sliders. I just copied and pasted the message from my psn account. I will test his suggested changes and will offer my comments as well. I hope you some of you test them and offer your opinions as well.

    Without making too many changes. I would suggest these so hopefully this helps out a little.

    Pass Blocking - 35 (Both)
    Run Blocking - 35 (Both)

    Lowering these helped decrease suction blocking on the offensive line.

    Pass Coverage - 45 (User)

    Seems like the CPU never tries deep passes with anything higher

    Interceptions - 45 (Both)

    Well I'm not the best person to judge INT sliders but this seemed realistic.
     
  11. bcduggan

    bcduggan Walk On

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,771
    interceptions for both in suggested changes should be 25 not 45. sorry for typo
     
  12. mikedredd

    mikedredd Crop Life

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,328
    seems to be working better...the LB's just knock down passes over the middle (with their 60 inch verticals) but I can live with a bat down rather than a crazy interception...as for the blocking I agree the CPU needed adjustment...I just cant run the ball anymore...then again SDSU's running game is not the best
     

Share This Page